MobilityBench:一个用于评估现实世界移动场景中路线规划智能体的基准 / MobilityBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Route-Planning Agents in Real-World Mobility Scenarios
1️⃣ 一句话总结
这篇论文提出了一个名为MobilityBench的标准化测试平台,专门用来评估基于大语言模型的路线规划助手在真实世界出行场景中的表现,发现现有模型在满足个性化偏好方面仍有很大提升空间。
Route-planning agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for supporting everyday human mobility through natural language interaction and tool-mediated decision making. However, systematic evaluation in real-world mobility settings is hindered by diverse routing demands, non-deterministic mapping services, and limited reproducibility. In this study, we introduce MobilityBench, a scalable benchmark for evaluating LLM-based route-planning agents in real-world mobility scenarios. MobilityBench is constructed from large-scale, anonymized real user queries collected from Amap and covers a broad spectrum of route-planning intents across multiple cities worldwide. To enable reproducible, end-to-end evaluation, we design a deterministic API-replay sandbox that eliminates environmental variance from live services. We further propose a multi-dimensional evaluation protocol centered on outcome validity, complemented by assessments of instruction understanding, planning, tool use, and efficiency. Using MobilityBench, we evaluate multiple LLM-based route-planning agents across diverse real-world mobility scenarios and provide an in-depth analysis of their behaviors and performance. Our findings reveal that current models perform competently on Basic information retrieval and Route Planning tasks, yet struggle considerably with Preference-Constrained Route Planning, underscoring significant room for improvement in personalized mobility applications. We publicly release the benchmark data, evaluation toolkit, and documentation at this https URL .
MobilityBench:一个用于评估现实世界移动场景中路线规划智能体的基准 / MobilityBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Route-Planning Agents in Real-World Mobility Scenarios
这篇论文提出了一个名为MobilityBench的标准化测试平台,专门用来评估基于大语言模型的路线规划助手在真实世界出行场景中的表现,发现现有模型在满足个性化偏好方面仍有很大提升空间。
源自 arXiv: 2602.22638