菜单

关于 🐙 GitHub
arXiv 提交日期: 2026-03-05
📄 Abstract - BioLLMAgent: A Hybrid Framework with Enhanced Structural Interpretability for Simulating Human Decision-Making in Computational Psychiatry

Computational psychiatry faces a fundamental trade-off: traditional reinforcement learning (RL) models offer interpretability but lack behavioral realism, while large language model (LLM) agents generate realistic behaviors but lack structural interpretability. We introduce BioLLMAgent, a novel hybrid framework that combines validated cognitive models with the generative capabilities of LLMs. The framework comprises three core components: (i) an Internal RL Engine for experience-driven value learning; (ii) an External LLM Shell for high-level cognitive strategies and therapeutic interventions; and (iii) a Decision Fusion Mechanism for integrating components via weighted utility. Comprehensive experiments on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) across six clinical and healthy datasets demonstrate that BioLLMAgent accurately reproduces human behavioral patterns while maintaining excellent parameter identifiability (correlations $>0.67$). Furthermore, the framework successfully simulates cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) principles and reveals, through multi-agent dynamics, that community-wide educational interventions may outperform individual treatments. Validated across reward-punishment learning and temporal discounting tasks, BioLLMAgent provides a structurally interpretable "computational sandbox" for testing mechanistic hypotheses and intervention strategies in psychiatric research.

顶级标签: medical llm agents
详细标签: computational psychiatry hybrid framework reinforcement learning decision-making cognitive models 或 搜索:

BioLLMAgent:一个增强结构可解释性的混合框架,用于模拟计算精神病学中的人类决策 / BioLLMAgent: A Hybrid Framework with Enhanced Structural Interpretability for Simulating Human Decision-Making in Computational Psychiatry


1️⃣ 一句话总结

这篇论文提出了一个名为BioLLMAgent的混合智能体框架,它巧妙结合了传统强化学习模型的结构可解释性与大语言模型的行为真实性,为精神病学研究提供了一个既能模拟人类复杂决策行为、又能清晰解释其内部机制的‘计算沙盒’,并成功用于模拟治疗干预和评估群体干预效果。

源自 arXiv: 2603.05016