可信的库普曼算子学习:不变性诊断与误差界 / Trustworthy Koopman Operator Learning: Invariance Diagnostics and Error Bounds
1️⃣ 一句话总结
这篇论文提出了一套新方法,用于诊断和量化数据驱动的库普曼算子近似模型中的误差,并提供了可验证的误差界限,从而帮助用户判断模型是否可靠并指导其改进,最终实现更可信的非线性系统分析与预测。
Koopman operator theory provides a global linear representation of nonlinear dynamics and underpins many data-driven methods. In practice, however, finite-dimensional feature spaces induced by a user-chosen dictionary are rarely invariant, so closure failures and projection errors lead to spurious eigenvalues, misleading Koopman modes, and overconfident forecasts. This paper addresses a central validation problem in data-driven Koopman methods: how to quantify invariance and projection errors for an arbitrary feature space using only snapshot data, and how to use these diagnostics to produce actionable guarantees and guide dictionary refinement? A unified a posteriori methodology is developed for certifying when a Koopman approximation is trustworthy and improving it when it is not. Koopman invariance is quantified using principal angles between a subspace and its Koopman image, yielding principal observables and a principal angle decomposition (PAD), a dynamics-informed alternative to SVD truncation with significantly improved performance. Multi-step error bounds are derived for Koopman and Perron--Frobenius mode decompositions, including RKHS-based pointwise guarantees, and are complemented by Gaussian process expected error surrogates. The resulting toolbox enables validated spectral analysis, certified forecasting, and principled dictionary and kernel learning, demonstrated on chaotic and high-dimensional benchmarks and real-world datasets, including cavity flow and the Pluto--Charon system.
可信的库普曼算子学习:不变性诊断与误差界 / Trustworthy Koopman Operator Learning: Invariance Diagnostics and Error Bounds
这篇论文提出了一套新方法,用于诊断和量化数据驱动的库普曼算子近似模型中的误差,并提供了可验证的误差界限,从而帮助用户判断模型是否可靠并指导其改进,最终实现更可信的非线性系统分析与预测。
源自 arXiv: 2603.15091