菜单

关于 🐙 GitHub
arXiv 提交日期: 2026-06-28
📄 Abstract - Two kinds of robustness are not the same: disentangling fault tolerance and low-SNR robustness in multi-domain event detection on real data

Reliable event detection underpins induced-seismicity monitoring for Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) and geothermal operations, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), and industrial condition monitoring. In each setting a detector must stay reliable both when sensors fail and when the signal is buried in noise. These two failure modes are routinely conflated, and architectural complexity is often credited with robustness it may not deserve. We assemble a unified binary event-detection benchmark from three physically distinct real sources -- Hi-net seismic waveforms, Utah FORGE 2024 borehole DAS, and MAFAULDA industrial vibration -- each mapped to a common 8-channel, 256-sample representation, and evaluate a fault-tolerant detector (CEPHALON) trained with per-sample sensor-dropout against standard detectors (a 1D convolutional network, a temporal convolutional network, and a compact Transformer) trained with an identical recipe. On clean data every model is near-perfect (AUC ~ 0.99). Under progressive sensor loss, simple models with sensor-dropout are already robust and CEPHALON holds no advantage. Under additive noise, however, CEPHALON degrades far more gracefully: at -2.5 dB its overall AUC is 0.939 versus 0.532-0.572 for the convolutional baselines. Same-architecture ablations isolate the cause: disabling internal redundancy at inference reduces the low-SNR advantage only modestly, whereas removing sensor-dropout training collapses it (0.899 to 0.603 at -5 dB). The training recipe is therefore the dominant cause and parallel redundancy only secondary. We release a complete, numbered, reproducible pipeline so that every figure can be regenerated.

顶级标签: machine learning model evaluation systems
详细标签: event detection robustness fault tolerance low-snr benchmark 或 搜索:

两种鲁棒性并非同一回事:基于真实数据多域事件检测中故障容错与低信噪比鲁棒性的解耦分析 / Two kinds of robustness are not the same: disentangling fault tolerance and low-SNR robustness in multi-domain event detection on real data


1️⃣ 一句话总结

本文通过分析地震、光纤传感和工业振动三种真实数据的事件检测任务,揭示了模型对传感器故障的鲁棒性与其在低信噪比下保持准确性的能力本质上是两种不同的属性,并证明通过训练阶段随机屏蔽部分传感器输入(传感器丢弃训练)能够显著提升模型在噪声环境下的性能,而增加模型内部冗余结构的效果相对有限。

源自 arXiv: 2606.29339