菜单

关于 🐙 GitHub
arXiv 提交日期: 2026-07-02
📄 Abstract - Denser $\neq$ Better: Limits of On-Policy Self-Distillation for Continual Post-Training

Continual post-training enables foundation models to acquire new knowledge while preserving existing capabilities. Recent work suggests that on-policy learning can mitigate forgetting, with on-policy self-distillation emerging as a particularly attractive approach. In this work, we revisit this optimistic view through self-distillation policy optimization (SDPO). Our experiments show that SDPO can accelerate in-domain specialization when teacher signals are stable and well aligned, but it struggles to generalize to out-of-distribution scenarios. In continual post-training, SDPO exhibits stronger forgetting and can even collapse, whereas on-policy reinforcement learning methods such as GRPO adapt more conservatively and better preserve prior capabilities. Further analyses reveal that denser self-distillation induces larger drift in both parameter space and response space, and can amplify high-frequency formatting artifacts through a self-reinforcing teacher--student loop. These findings suggest that on-policy data alone is insufficient for continual learning. Dense self-distillation can accelerate specialization when teacher targets are stable and token-level supervision is reliable, but it should not be treated as a default stabilizer for continual post-training. Our code is available at this https URL.

顶级标签: llm machine learning model training
详细标签: continual learning self-distillation on-policy forgetting reinforcement learning 或 搜索:

更密集未必更好:在线自蒸馏在持续后训练中的局限性 / Denser $\neq$ Better: Limits of On-Policy Self-Distillation for Continual Post-Training


1️⃣ 一句话总结

这篇论文通过实验发现,在线自蒸馏(SDPO)虽然能在稳定场景下加速模型对特定领域的适应,但在持续后训练中会导致更严重的知识遗忘和能力崩溃,而更密集的蒸馏反而会加剧模型参数和输出的偏移,因此不建议将其作为持续学习的默认稳定方法。

源自 arXiv: 2607.01763