AI辅助软件开发生命周期的三阶段评估 / Three-Phase Evaluation of AI-Assisted Software Development Life Cycle
1️⃣ 一句话总结
本文通过让四名开发者分三阶段使用不同级别的AI辅助工具(GitHub Copilot和AWS Kiro)重新实现同一个全栈网页应用,发现AI自主性越高,开发时间越短、需求达标率越高、开发者心理负担越轻,但挫折感略有上升,其中AWS Kiro表现最佳。
This paper presents an exploratory evaluation of how increasing levels of AI autonomy affect software development productivity, requirement adherence, and developer cognitive workload. A team of four developers reimplemented the same full-stack web application across three sequential phases: partial AI-assisted development using GitHub Copilot, an AI-exclusive workflow using GitHub Copilot, and an AI-exclusive workflow using AWS Kiro. Evaluation metrics included development effort (hours), requirement adherence (RITM score), AI-interaction efficiency, and NASA-TLX workload measures. Across phases, higher levels of AI autonomy were associated with reduced development effort, improved requirement adherence, and lower self-reported mental workload, while developer frustration increased modestly. The AWS Kiro phase achieved the strongest overall performance on most measured dimensions, suggesting that tooling architecture may influence outcomes independently of AI autonomy level.
AI辅助软件开发生命周期的三阶段评估 / Three-Phase Evaluation of AI-Assisted Software Development Life Cycle
本文通过让四名开发者分三阶段使用不同级别的AI辅助工具(GitHub Copilot和AWS Kiro)重新实现同一个全栈网页应用,发现AI自主性越高,开发时间越短、需求达标率越高、开发者心理负担越轻,但挫折感略有上升,其中AWS Kiro表现最佳。
源自 arXiv: 2607.05125