论ESM3作为通用AI模型在欧盟《人工智能法案》下构成系统性风险的情形 / The Case for ESM3 as a General-Purpose AI Model with Systemic Risk Under the EU AI Act
1️⃣ 一句话总结
本文分析指出,前沿生物基础模型ESM3虽在理论上应被欧盟《人工智能法案》中针对高风险通用AI模型的条款所约束,但由于法案措辞模糊,目前实际上并未被该法规有效监管,因此作者呼吁采取措施弥补这一漏洞。
Due to ambiguity in the wording of the EU AI Act, we examine the question of to what extent frontier biological foundation models such as ESM3 are subject to obligations for general-purpose AI models with systemic risk under the EU AI Act. In this paper, we map ESM3 to the biorisk chain, and conclude that it would be desirable if the providers of ESM3 and similar biological models were subject to these obligations, which would require them to assess and mitigate dual-use risks from their models. We then perform an analysis, comparing the attributes of ESM3 to the classification criteria in the AI Act and the supporting material. We conclude that at this time, ESM3 does not appear to be meaningfully regulated by the Act. We then propose remedies to correct the situation.
论ESM3作为通用AI模型在欧盟《人工智能法案》下构成系统性风险的情形 / The Case for ESM3 as a General-Purpose AI Model with Systemic Risk Under the EU AI Act
本文分析指出,前沿生物基础模型ESM3虽在理论上应被欧盟《人工智能法案》中针对高风险通用AI模型的条款所约束,但由于法案措辞模糊,目前实际上并未被该法规有效监管,因此作者呼吁采取措施弥补这一漏洞。
源自 arXiv: 2605.01611