菜单

关于 🐙 GitHub
arXiv 提交日期: 2026-06-01
📄 Abstract - Spectral Audit of In-Context Operator Networks

Existing evaluations of neural operators and in-context operator learning rely primarily on prediction error, but accurate output prediction does not guarantee the correct local dynamical structure. A model may match solutions while exhibiting incorrect sensitivities, distorted frequency response, spurious mode coupling, or unstable tangent behavior. We introduce a Jacobian-based spectral audit for in-context operator learning. For a fixed prompt, we differentiate the network output with respect to the query function and view the resulting Jacobian as a learned tangent operator. Projecting it onto Fourier modes, we obtain a local spectral characterization of the inferred operator, including frequency-dependent gains, phase structure, and cross-mode coupling. The audit complements standard prediction metrics by testing whether the model reproduces local mechanisms of the underlying PDE operator rather than only outputs. Across benchmarks, the audit reveals distinct operator-level phenomena, including phase transport, viscosity-dependent damping, nonlinear mode coupling, and reaction--diffusion stability structure. It also detects failures partially hidden by prediction-error metrics, including high-frequency degradation, incorrect phase recovery, and prompt--operator inconsistencies. Corrupted or internally inconsistent prompts lead to degraded tangent-operator structure even when pointwise predictions remain partially accurate. Our results suggest that prediction accuracy and local operator fidelity are distinct properties of learned neural operators. Our framework also provides a diagnostic for stability, sensitivity, and operator consistency.

顶级标签: machine learning model evaluation
详细标签: neural operators in-context learning spectral analysis jacobian pde 或 搜索:

上下文算子网络的频谱审计 / Spectral Audit of In-Context Operator Networks


1️⃣ 一句话总结

本文提出了一种基于雅可比矩阵的频谱审计方法,通过分析模型对输入扰动的局部响应(如频率增益和模式耦合),来检测神经网络在学习偏微分方程算子时是否存在隐藏的动力学错误,从而弥补仅依赖预测误差评估模型的不足。

源自 arXiv: 2606.02427